Difference between revisions of "Help talk:Adding New Albums"

From Lyriki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
::I just did a search at AMG and found an electronica group called Various Artists and two artists in a sense called VA, except one is V/A and the other is V.A.  So, does that mean we should go with your first solution?  --[[User:Eric Jack Nash|Nash]] 17:05, 24 January 2006 (PST)
 
::I just did a search at AMG and found an electronica group called Various Artists and two artists in a sense called VA, except one is V/A and the other is V.A.  So, does that mean we should go with your first solution?  --[[User:Eric Jack Nash|Nash]] 17:05, 24 January 2006 (PST)
 +
 +
:::Or we could go with <span style="font-family:courier;">(Various Artists):Album Name (Year)</span> which should avoid confusion and keep to the standards. --[[User:MindlessXD|MindlessXD]] 17:41, 24 January 2006 (PST)

Revision as of 18:41, 24 January 2006

I'd like to suggest that we move our "AlbumArt" naming style to one similar to our album naming scheme -- "AlbumArt:Artist:Album". Any objections? We wouldn't have to move all the art that's already been uploaded, since their titles don't generally affect the end user. --MindlessXD 15:16, 4 January 2006 (PST)

Definately makes more sense, not sure why I didn't think of it before. I've thought about the AlbumArt tag itself, but, it should probably remain as there may be other types of media in the future that Lyriki will support.
Looks like images are a bit screwed up :( ... colon's aren't allowed in image names. --MindlessXD 15:47, 4 January 2006 (PST)
Doh, maybe that's why I didn't suggest that :P can't remember if I tried it now or not, but that makes sense. It's a small thing, and as long as most filenames follow a consistent thing, I doubt it'll be much of a problem. --Nanenj 16:09, 4 January 2006 (PST)


What does everyone think of this style of album pages? --MindlessXD 19:04, 12 January 2006 (PST)

Somehow that looks familiar, ;). I think one of the very first attempts looked very similar to that. One of the album templates I like more is with the Artist link above, see Thrice:Identity Crisis (2001). Perhaps lining up 'Track list' looks pretty, but, I'm fairly sure track list is obvious ;). I'm not too sure of it myself, just so much of the text is huge, and only the name of the album is really important info. The words 'track list' being huge seems kinda silly ;) My brain missed a step in there. I meant to say perhaps I'd like a template that used what's currently default, (as per the thrice page) but with Tracklist lined up properly. --Nanenj 19:43, 12 January 2006 (PST)
Hmm? The current artist template includes "== Track List ==", but I suppose it doesn't really need to be there at all, as you said. --MindlessXD 20:22, 12 January 2006 (PST)
I removed "== Track List ==", and I agree it looks better. --MindlessXD 20:28, 12 January 2006 (PST)
Yar, I've neglected putting tracklist above... well, nearly every album page I've done recently ;) I think it might still need a little work (None of the variations are absolutely oh my gosh that's it! perfect.) :) The biggest thing with the album page is because it features the album art it can be made mildly attractive. I've pondered some kind of formatting for the tracks (like a tracklistbox or something, similar to how the userboxes on wikipedia are.), but, at the same time. Lyriki's main focus is having the information available. Presentation will constantly improve. --Nanenj 20:32, 12 January 2006 (PST)
After MediaWiki 1.6 is released, making a decent album template should be quite easy, however I don't know how CPU intensive such templates are -- I don't want to bog down the server. --MindlessXD 20:41, 12 January 2006 (PST)
Evelyn has more info on that, however, I'm thinking it's not exactly easy to bog down the hosting she's got. We can see though. --24.144.33.50 21:00, 12 January 2006 (PST)

General Editing Help

...should go here. For example,

Type this into your address bar: "http://lyriki.com/index.php?title=YourTitleHere". Where it says "YourTitleHere" put the name of the album you want to add, in this form:

doesn't really belong here but could be incorporated into the Help:Editing page. If the user does not know how to make a wiki page, that is where [s]he should go. --MindlessXD 18:40, 19 January 2006 (PST)

Then hit "go". When you're at the album's new page you simply click the "edit" tab and then create the page. For first time users and for most others who want to stay uniform, it is a good idea to use one of the recommended page formats.

...more general info. --MindlessXD 18:46, 19 January 2006 (PST)

various artist albums

Does anyone have a suggestion or even know of a rule concerning albums that have various artists? --Nash 13:43, 24 January 2006 (PST)

I can see a few ways for handling them. One would simply be Album Name (Year). The one rule that would apply globally to various artists would be no artist page, obviously. However, if we wanted to keep the naming of pages pretty standard, could use 'Various Artists' as the name of the 'artist', IE: Various Artists:Album Name (Year). I'm leaning towards designating an artist name like 'VA' or 'Various Artists' and using that as the artist name and using the previously set standard for naming albums. However, that might collide with some witty group that decides to use Various Artist or VA as their name. --Nanenj 16:15, 24 January 2006 (PST)
I just did a search at AMG and found an electronica group called Various Artists and two artists in a sense called VA, except one is V/A and the other is V.A. So, does that mean we should go with your first solution? --Nash 17:05, 24 January 2006 (PST)
Or we could go with (Various Artists):Album Name (Year) which should avoid confusion and keep to the standards. --MindlessXD 17:41, 24 January 2006 (PST)